Writing / voice / sound / direction
How I Make Things
The method changes. The intention matters.
My process changes with the song, my energy, and the resources available to me. Some recordings involve more hands-on writing, singing, recording, and editing; others rely more heavily on generative tools. Lately, managing releases and promotion has left less energy for making music, and I’ve leaned more on those tools. That balance isn’t fixed. I still want to develop my skills, record, experiment, and collaborate with other musicians.
Depending on the song, I may contribute lyrics, melodies, vocals, beats, sounds, MIDI, rough instrumental sketches, arrangement ideas, editing, timing changes, cuts, comping, or broader production direction. Sometimes I record a new vocal performance. Other times a later recording may use generated vocals based on earlier recordings of my voice.
AuDHD and a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) affect how I work. I use traditional recording, digital production, and AI-assisted tools to work around cognitive and physical limitations. Accessibility matters to me because having another way to build a song can mean finally being able to finish it. I still make the choices about what belongs in the recording and what I want it to communicate.
I prefer to describe that process song by song instead of pretending every track was made the same way.
Explore the song-by-song process notes →Tools, responsibility, possibility.
Using AI-assisted tools doesn’t mean I’m comfortable with every aspect of how they’re developed or used. Consent, credit, and compensation matter to me, including when artists’ work is used for training.
I share concerns about musicians’ livelihoods and platforms becoming overwhelmed with fully AI-generated material. My hope is that these tools develop responsibly, expanding access to making music while supporting the people whose creativity gives it meaning.